Inside the Alaa M. Trial #71: The Joker

Concerns: Some testimonies have torture descriptions.

In fact, this resume is not considered a trial record, revealing that it is only an unofficial presentation of the meeting.

In the submitted CV, [The information closed in parentheses is regarded as a memo of our judicial observer] and "the information imposed by quotes is considered as a statement of witnesses, arbitrators, or lawyers." The witness name and identification information are edited.

[Note: Currently, SJAC has created two reports on each trial date: (1) A short resume announced during the trial, (2), which is published at the end of the trial, is quite detailed, almost absolutely absolutely absolute. A report. The trial was suddenly prolonged, so Siac could no longer make two repos. From this point, SJAC will add some components to the first image of the report. Some details are edited to protect the witness of the witness and maintain the unity of the trial.

The 71st SJAC trial forecast report describes the 120th, 121st, and 122nd of the Ara M trial in Frankfurt, Germany. This week, a new witness appeared on the first day of the trial. The P35 is a Host's Ara M. Interrogation in [Edit the location], and he touches on Damascus on the date of M., and witnesses have actually confirmed this. He said that M. actually arrived at the end of November 2011, in fact, in fact, he left Homs, despite the claims in the indictment. 。 In Facebook's messenger, he chatted with another colleague. However, the details of the chat are unknown. < SPAN> concerns: Some testimonies have a description of torture.

In fact, this resume is not considered a trial record, revealing that it is only an unofficial presentation of the meeting.

In the submitted CV, [The information closed in parentheses is regarded as a memo of our judicial observer] and "the information imposed by quotes is considered as a statement of witnesses, arbitrators, or lawyers." The witness name and identification information are edited.

[Note: Currently, SJAC has created two reports on each trial date: (1) A short resume announced during the trial, (2), which is published at the end of the trial, is quite detailed, almost absolutely absolutely absolute. A report. The trial was suddenly prolonged, so Siac could no longer make two repos. From this point, SJAC will add some components to the first image of the report. Some details are edited to protect the witness of the witness and maintain the unity of the trial.

The 71st SJAC trial forecast report describes the 120th, 121st, and 122nd of the Ara M trial in Frankfurt, Germany. This week, a new witness appeared on the first day of the trial. The P35 is a Host's Ara M. Interrogation in [Edit the location], and he touches on Damascus on the date of M., and witnesses have actually confirmed this. He said that M. actually arrived at the end of November 2011, in fact, in fact, he left Homs, despite the claims in the indictment. 。 In Facebook's messenger, he chatted with another colleague. However, the details of the chat are unknown. Concerns: Some testimonies have torture descriptions.

Day 120 – March 19, 2024

In fact, this resume is not considered a trial record, revealing that it is only an unofficial presentation of the meeting.

In the submitted CV, [The information closed in parentheses is regarded as a memo of our judicial observer] and "the information imposed by quotes is considered as a statement of witnesses, arbitrators, or lawyers." The witness name and identification information are edited.

[Note: Currently, SJAC has created two reports on each trial date: (1) A short resume announced during the trial, (2), which is published at the end of the trial, is quite detailed, almost absolutely absolutely absolute. A report. The trial was suddenly prolonged, so Siac could no longer make two repos. From this point, SJAC will add some components to the first image of the report. Some details are edited to protect the witness of the witness and maintain the unity of the trial.

The 71st SJAC trial forecast report describes the 120th, 121st, and 122nd of the Ara M trial in Frankfurt, Germany. This week, a new witness appeared on the first day of the trial. The P35 is a Host's Ara M. Interrogation in [Edit the location], and he touches on Damascus on the date of M., and witnesses have actually confirmed this. He said that M. actually arrived at the end of November 2011, in fact, in fact, he left Homs, despite the claims in the indictment. 。 In Facebook's messenger, he chatted with another colleague. However, the details of the chat are unknown.

Apart from this, a document with a statement signed by witnesses was shown. In the document, the witness explains that Mr. is based in Damascus at the time of the charges, and witnesses have never seen Mr. or combatants. Later, witnesses did not remember the interrogation of the statement, but it was against the allegations of the media. It was written in the highest level of German, and as a result, in court, this is basically his composition. Finally, witnesses basically argued that someone else wrote or may have helped him, and in the table of contents, only his thoughts recorded in his personal initiative. He claimed that it was done. At least, he probably had a noble M., or someone else, who had transferred his message, and as a result he accepted him, who accepted him. In the court, the court canceled the rest of the interrogation and interrogated in the appropriate seat.

The lawyer had the opportunity to say that Al Ai helped R35 to brush the statement submitted in the previous day's trial. The furious judge, while Al Ai stands on the testimony, reminds me of the previous meeting, which showed the low knowledge in the field of German law, but actually only had a poor performance. He reported Al Aigi about this careless and prone behavior. One witness later accepted that Al Ai had definitely correct the testimony, and was surprised that Al Aig was silence in his last visit.

Later, the interrogation of the P35 was resumed and was asked about the room where M was. The witness stated that the defendant was a supporter of the administration, but not an extremist who only insults demonstrations. The witness said that one of the former colleagues described M as an extremist. The arbitrator answered the P35 question, so he believed. In response to the question, P35 acknowledged that M had forged his dissertation so that he would not lose his medical training. The witness testimony was justified due to the fact that M had to conclude at this point.

In the third trial, a document about M and online memo were submitted to court and translated into German by specialized linguists. Judge said to the person who is likely to be a witness, but he said that he would not be able to submit evidence in court or video communication.

On this day, a new witness, [Redacted Name] [P35], appeared before the court. P35-3 7-jea r-old Heart specialist in Syria. He was a relative of Redacted Place, was located near [Redacted Place] and studied medicine at Redacted Place. Later, he started working at the Redacted Place Research Institute Clinic. In September 2013, he left Syria, obtained a visa with Redacted A Place, where he established a cardiology clinic and worked as a senior doctor. He had a pretty good law in Redacted Place, almost always without a translator given by court.

In response to the jury's question, the P35 recalled that there was no effect on the battle in Syria. He spent a lot of time in Damascus, bombing, missile shields, and shooting in a close area, but just shot as soon as the missile approached the room. At that time, I heard that there were many killings. Damascus smelled every day. Damascus, his hometown, lived and maintained by most Christians, but was exposed to bombardment and destroyed roads and homes.

In response to the question, he replied that he was actually a Christian, but the Christian was not a fans of the rampage. When the battle began, they had the opportunity to choose one. He explained that the opposition supporters were listed as extremists, and that Christians ran to the administration and the bombardment in their residence had a sensuality of history. The P35 thought that he had become a gray hair as a result of "I didn't want to interfere with this." Christians swim in that direction and had to assume what they were actually there. I think this was all wrong. The killed people and the children were not sacrificed.

The judges wanted to know how the battle had affected the job of the casualties. The P35 explained that there were actually injured people at the research institute, for example, many dead and inaccharides. The P35 explained that there were no injuries due to the war, but most people were visiting the clinic, led by the elderly. < Span> On this day, a new witness, [Redacted Name] [P35], appeared before the court. P35-3 7-jea r-old Heart specialist in Syria. He was a relative of Redacted Place, was located near [Redacted Place] and studied medicine at Redacted Place. Later, he started working at the Redacted Place Research Institute Clinic. In September 2013, he left Syria, obtained a visa with Redacted A Place, where he established a cardiology clinic and worked as a senior doctor. He had a pretty good law in Redacted Place, almost always without a translator given by court.

In response to the jury's question, the P35 recalled that there was no effect on the battle in Syria. He spent a lot of time in Damascus, bombing, missile shields, and shooting in a close area, but just shot as soon as the missile approached the room. At that time, I heard that there were many killings. Damascus smelled every day. Damascus, his hometown, lived and maintained by most Christians, but was exposed to bombardment and destroyed roads and homes.

In response to the question, he replied that he was actually a Christian, but the Christian was not a fans of the rampage. When the battle began, they had the opportunity to choose one. He explained that the opposition supporters were listed as extremists, and that Christians ran to the administration and the bombardment in their residence had a sensuality of history. The P35 thought that he had become a gray hair as a result of "I didn't want to interfere with this." Christians swim in that direction and had to assume what they actually had. I think this was all wrong. The killed people and the children were not sacrificed.

The judges wanted to know how the battle had affected the job of the casualties. The P35 explained that there were actually injured people at the research institute, for example, many dead and inaccharides. P35 explained that although there were no injuries due to the war, most people were visiting the clinic, led by the elderly. On this day, a new witness, [Redacted Name] [P35], appeared before the court. P35-3 7-jea r-old Heart specialist in Syria. He was a relative of Redacted Place, was located near [Redacted Place] and studied medicine at Redacted Place. Later, he started working at the Redacted Place Research Institute Clinic. In September 2013, he left Syria, obtained a visa with Redacted A Place, where he established a cardiology clinic and worked as a senior doctor. He had a pretty good law in Redacted Place, almost always without a translator given by court.

In response to the jury's question, the P35 recalled that there was no effect on the battle in Syria. He spent a lot of time in Damascus, bombing, missile shields, and shooting in a close area, but just shot as soon as the missile approached the room. At that time, I heard that there were many killings. Damascus smelled every day. Damascus, his hometown, lived and maintained by most Christians, but was exposed to bombardment and destroyed roads and homes.

In response to the question, he replied that he was actually a Christian, but the Christian was not a fans of the rampage. When the battle began, they had the opportunity to choose one. He explained that the opposition supporters were listed as extremists, and that Christians ran to the administration and the bombardment in their residence had a sensuality of history. The P35 thought that he had become a gray hair as a result of "I didn't want to interfere with this." Christians swim in that direction and had to assume what they were actually there. I think this was all wrong. The killed people and the children were not sacrificed.

The judges wanted to know how the battle had affected the job of the casualties. The P35 explained that there were actually injured people at the research institute, for example, many dead and inaccharides. The P35 explained that there were no injuries due to the war, but most people were visiting the clinic, led by the elderly.

The judge asked a witness if he had heard or saw something from another hospital. The P35 reminiscent that he had visited Al Mazek Hospital, but all were only ordinary residential areas. The judges introduced the testimony he went to the police, and p35 acknowledged that the patient had been treated terribly, but not a doctor but a nurse and a cleaning person. Also, since Al Mazek Hospital is located in the center of Damascus, he had a certain image, and he heard the cruel treatment he heard at other hospitals, so this did not happen at Al Mazek Hospital. I mentioned.

Day 121 – March 21, 2024

I was interested in how P35 and M had met each other, but P35 said they studied together on [Edit Site]. Both of them became a friend with M and moved to him with other two friends (economists and engineers). He described M as cooperative, fully energy and always active and cool. In addition, M said that M was the most har d-working student, but was not good, but easily passed all exams. He remembered that M was from a wealthy family and had a car called Redacted. He is also M. Krill. Witnesses also recalled that M was refused to enroll in the university clinic to trauma, because of the demand for the best results, so M had begun to work in a military hospital. After the two broke up to start work, the contacts decreased.

As a result of the interrogation, Witnesses remembered that M. had lived with her parents and siblings in Homs apartments from the middle of [Date Extract] to the end of [Date Extract]. During this time, they did not contact them, but they probably had a call twice on the Christian holiday. However, he had a specific memory of meeting M about whether he had talked about the war, but he refused and added that this has never appeared.

The judges wanted to know why M moved to Damascus. The P35 replied that the reason was unknown, but suggested that M, a close friend M, had moved and M. P35 also recalled that when a friend learned about Moving M through Facebook's messenger, he was surprised. The jury asked if M had asked him to help when he organized things or searching for an apartment. Witnesses replied that M was not a man who needed help. Two weeks after M arrived in Damascus, M was able to show him how everything was organized in Damascus.

After the break, the judge asked who had heard about the arrival of M. P35 reminded me that my colleague ([name secret]), who was studying together, taught me this in Facebook's messenger. P35 said that he had a screenshot of the conversation and wanted to show it to the court. The judge discussed how to see this new evidence and asked Witnesses to show a chat conversation instead of screenshots. The Witnesses confirmed it, began to scroll the chat, showed the relevant excerpts to the judge and the judge, and translated the conversation.

Before the translator began translating the message, Witnesses explained that M was called a nickname called Conidental, not her real name. [Hidden name] P35 is said to have told M to move to Damascus next week. The message was sent on November 11, 2011. The prosecutor asked if it was possible to see the metadata of each message, but it was, for example, Whatsapp. Witnesses also acknowledged that it had deleted a part of the message because it contained dirty words that M's mother could not show. The P35 realized that the deleted message may not have been a good decision and checked again in [Name Secret].

The judge also asked if the P35 had been talking with the defendant. The P35 replied that he searched but did not find anything, suggesting that it did not exist because M had deleted his account. However, the P35 has allowed the German Federal Police (BKA) to read all the remaining conversations with M. His consent was taken into account, read and approved the conversation between M. from August 1, 2011 to the end of 2015 and the conversation with the remaining M and the secret name. < SPAN> After the break, the judge asked who heard M. P35 reminded me that my colleague ([name secret]), who was studying together, taught me this in Facebook's messenger. P35 said that he had a screenshot of the conversation and wanted to show it to the court. The judge discussed how to see this new evidence and asked Witnesses to show a chat conversation instead of screenshots. The Witnesses confirmed it, began to scroll the chat, showed the relevant excerpts to the judge and the judge, and translated the conversation.

Before the translator began translating the message, Witnesses explained that M was called a nickname called Conidental, not her real name. [Hidden name] P35 is said to have told M to move to Damascus next week. The message was sent on November 11, 2011. The prosecutor asked if it was possible to see the metadata of each message, but it was, for example, Whatsapp. Witnesses also acknowledged that it had deleted a part of the message because it contained dirty words that M's mother could not show. The P35 realized that the deleted message may not have been a good decision and checked again in [Name Secret].

The judge also asked if the P35 had been talking with the defendant. The P35 replied that he searched but did not find anything, suggesting that it did not exist because M had deleted his account. However, the P35 has allowed the German Federal Police (BKA) to read all the remaining conversations with M. His consent was taken into account, read and approved the conversation between M. from August 1, 2011 to the end of 2015 and the conversation with the remaining M and the secret name. After the break, the judge asked who had heard about the arrival of M. P35 reminded me that my colleague ([name secret]), who was studying together, taught me this in Facebook's messenger. P35 said that he had a screenshot of the conversation and wanted to show it to the court. The judge discussed how to see this new evidence and asked Witnesses to show a chat conversation instead of screenshots. The witness confirmed it, began to scroll the chat, showed the relevant excerpts to the judge and the judge, and translated the conversation.

Before the translator began translating the message, Witnesses explained that M was called a nickname called Conidental, not her real name. [Hidden name] P35 is said to have told M to move to Damascus next week. The message was sent on November 11, 2011. The prosecutor asked if it was possible to see the metadata of each message, but it was, for example, Whatsapp. Witnesses also acknowledged that it had deleted some of the messages because it contained dirty words that could not be shown to M's mother. The P35 realized that the deleted message may not have been a good decision and checked again in [Name Secret].

The judge also asked if the P35 had been talking with the defendant. The P35 replied that he searched but did not find anything, suggesting that it did not exist because M had deleted his account. However, the P35 has allowed the German Federal Police (BKA) to read all the remaining conversations with M. His consent was taken into account, read, and approved the conversation between M. from August 1, 2011 to the end of 2015 and the conversation with the remaining con conversations with M and the secret name.

The witness recalled that when he received additional questions about the conversation with [Name Secret], he found a chat after the suspicion of M became public and wanted to help a friend. He recalled that he had actually searched for information within two years and found a chat. In 2019, a witness reminded that it was impossible after a documentary in which M. M. Musi was abusing the sick in Homs in 2012. The arbitrator did not understand why P35 did not communicate information to lawyers, prosecutors, or court, despite the information necessary to help friends. The witness did not actually know, but replied, "I might have changed the situation."

The judges were surprised that witnesses had not given information. The P35 recommended M's parents to chat, and as a result, he deleted a problematic email, but he knew that he would be called by testimony, so he wanted to wait for the referee. The mediation commissioner reads in detail that the witnesses were doubted not to give M's advantageous testimony to M, which was exchanged between her sister and his wife M, and the impact of doing this testimony to P35. I asked if I gave it or rather waiting. The P35 trembled and needed an interpreter for the first time. The P35 was trembling and needed an interpreter for the first time. When asked if he talked about this before he appeared or talked about other witness testimony, this content is actually between 7-8 friends. He explained that he was always discussing, and was discussing hotel reservations, train tickets, and other related issues. The mediation chairman asked if he had already discussed the content, but the witness certainly approved the shared content and asked if he could talk. In fact, the arbitrator explained that this would be a problem of evidence, adding "Permission-Yes, smart-no", and declared a break for lunch. < SPAN> witnesses reminiscent that when he received additional questions about the conversation with [Name Secret], he found a chat after the allegations of M became public and wanted to help a friend. He recalled that he had actually searched for information within two years and found a chat. In 2019, a witness reminded that it was impossible after a documentary in which M. M. Musi was abusing the sick in Homs in 2012. The arbitrator did not understand why the P35 did not communicate information to lawyers, prosecutors, or court, despite the information necessary to help friends. The witness did not actually know, but replied, "I might have changed the situation."

The judges were surprised that witnesses had not given information. The P35 recommended M's parents to chat, and as a result, he deleted a problematic email, but he knew that he would be called by testimony, so he wanted to wait for the referee. The mediation commissioner reads in detail that the witnesses were doubted not to give M's advantageous testimony to M, which was exchanged between her sister and his wife M, and the impact of doing this testimony to P35. I asked if I gave it or rather waiting. The P35 trembled and needed an interpreter for the first time. The P35 was trembling and needed an interpreter for the first time. When asked if he talked about this before he appeared or talked about other witness testimony, this content is actually between 7-8 friends. He explained that he was always discussing, and was discussing hotel reservations, train tickets, and other related issues. The mediation chairman asked if he had already discussed the content, but the witness certainly approved the shared content and asked if he could talk. In fact, the arbitrator explained that this would be a problem of evidence, adding "Permission-Yes, smart-no", and declared a break for lunch. The witness recalled that when he received additional questions about the conversation with [Name Secret], he found a chat after the suspicion of M became public and wanted to help a friend. He recalled that he had actually searched for information within two years and found a chat. In 2019, a witness reminded that it was impossible after a documentary in which M. M. Musi was abusing the sick in Homs in 2012. The arbitrator did not understand why P35 did not communicate information to lawyers, prosecutors, or court, despite the information necessary to help friends. The witness did not actually know, but replied, "I might have changed the situation."

The judges were surprised that witnesses had not given information. The P35 recommended M's parents to chat, and as a result, he deleted a problematic email, but he knew that he would be called by testimony, so he wanted to wait for the referee. The mediation commissioner reads in detail that the witnesses were doubted not to give M's advantageous testimony to M, which was exchanged between her sister and his wife M, and the impact of doing this testimony to P35. I asked if I gave it or rather waiting. The P35 trembled and needed an interpreter for the first time. The P35 was trembling and needed an interpreter for the first time. When asked if he talked about this before he appeared or talked about other witness testimony, this content is actually between 7-8 friends. He explained that he was always discussing and discussing hotel reservations, train tickets, and other related issues. The mediation chairman asked if he had already discussed the content, but the witness certainly approved the shared content and asked if he could talk. In fact, the arbitrator explained that this would be a problem of evidence, adding "Permission-Yes, smart-no", and declared a break for lunch.

After the lunch break, the witness returned that after M arrived in Damascus, he and M were only intermittently talking. A witness to the arbitrator replied that M would have been logically arrived a week after the message, but did not remember. He also denied how he greeted M. He also repeatedly thought that his colleagues were fluttering, so he was very surprised at the announcement of M's arrival. A few months later, they often met their friends groups, but moved together in the 2012 [Date of Deality] and to the House owned by [Delivery Name] in the [Delivery place]. Witnesses reminiscent that they spent a huge amount of time with M when they were not shifted. P35 also remembered what M. Surgery was talking about his work, and M. In fact, to support surgery at a thir d-party personal clinic, Secret anonymous] [The witnesses did not know the surname, but when the arbitrator said it, he joined a doctor who was actually stated that it was absolutely his name. I remembered that. However, according to P35, M did not talk much about the patient. According to witnesses, at the end of [Date of Dealment], he and M.

And the arbiter family told witnesses to show their documents. [The document was projected by the projector. It is written in German, the witness's name and address, date [secret], words are written, and witnesses were signed. < SPAN> The witness returned after the lunch break reminiscent that after M arrived in Damascus, he and M had only talked intermittently. A witness to the arbitrator replied that M would have been logically arrived a week after the message, but did not remember. He also denied how he greeted M. He also repeatedly thought that his colleagues were fluttering, so he was very surprised at the announcement of M's arrival. A few months later, they often met their friends groups, but moved together in the 2012 [Date of Deality] and to the House owned by [Delivery Name] in the [Delivery place]. Witnesses reminiscent that they spent a huge amount of time with M when they were not shifted. P35 also remembered what M. Surgery was talking about his work, and M. In fact, to support surgery at a thir d-party personal clinic, Secret anonymous] [The witnesses did not know the surname, but when the arbitrator said it, he joined a doctor who was actually stated that it was absolutely his name. I remembered that. However, according to P35, M did not talk much about the patient. According to witnesses, at the end of [Date of Dealment], he and M.

And the arbiter family told witnesses to show their documents. [The document was projected by the projector. It is written in German, the witness's name and address, date [secret], words are written, and witnesses were signed. After the lunch break, the witness returned that after M arrived in Damascus, he and M were only intermittently talking. A witness to the arbitrator replied that M would have been logically arrived a week after the message, but did not remember. He also denied how he greeted M. He also repeatedly thought that his colleagues were fluttering, so he was very surprised at the announcement of M's arrival. A few months later, they often met their friends groups, but moved together in the 2012 [Date of Deality] and to the House owned by [Delivery Name] in the [Delivery place]. Witnesses reminiscent that they spent a huge amount of time with M when they were not shifted. P35 also remembered what M. Surgery was talking about his work, and M. In fact, to support surgery at a thir d-party personal clinic, Secret anonymous] [The witnesses did not know the surname, but when the arbitrator said it, he joined a doctor who was actually stated that it was absolutely his name. I remembered that. However, according to P35, M did not talk much about the patient. According to witnesses, at the end of [Date of Dealment], he and M.

And the arbiter family told witnesses to show their documents. [The document was projected by the projector. It is written in German, the witness's name and address, date [secret], words are written, and witnesses were signed.

The referee asked the content. P35 explained that it was a personal confession that confirmed that M was in Damascus at the Suspicion of Crime. As a result of the interrogation, witnesses said they actually wrote their statements. The arbitrator said he did not believe in him because he was really good in language, but his statement was written at a different [higher] level. The witness did not speak. During this time, the avitative family asked if someone was preparing for him. The witness denied this and explained that he had examined himself and used Google to correct his grammar. By the way, P35 states that M is definitely in Tartas. The P35 replied that it was actually thanks to the nobles at the time. The family also said that the P35 was very surprised at the intention of M's move to Damascus, but the statement stated that he had heard from M. Furthermore, the family added that the date of the record written when M was already in a temporary decision showed that the P35 had already knew the chat in the Facebook messenger mentioned above. 。 The witness acknowledged that M was actually detained, stating that it was actually a media reaction. The arbitrator repeatedly asked who had created a statement, or who had definitely lent it to the creation, but witnesses have no external support, and their intentions. I wrote it and claimed that I wanted to arrange a statement. However, the witness actually sent it to the [Deligious name] [M. Wife] and acknowledged that she was very likely to have transferred to someone. The judge told the witnesses: < SPAN> The referee asked the content. P35 explained that it was a personal confession that confirmed that M was in Damascus at the Suspicion of Crime. As a result of the interrogation, witnesses said they actually wrote their statements. The arbitrator said he did not believe in him because he was good at language, but his statement was written at a different [higher] level. The witness did not speak. During this time, the avitative family asked if someone was preparing for him. The witness denied this and explained that he had examined himself and used Google to correct his grammar. By the way, P35 states that M is definitely in Tartas. The P35 replied that it was actually thanks to the nobles at the time. The family also said that the P35 was very surprised at the intention of M's move to Damascus, but the statement stated that he had heard from M. Furthermore, the family added that the date of the record written when M was already in a temporary decision showed that the P35 had already knew the chat in the Facebook messenger mentioned above. 。 The witness acknowledged that M was actually detained, stating that it was actually a media reaction. The arbitrator repeatedly asked who had created a statement, or who had definitely lent it to the creation, but witnesses have no external support, and their intentions. I wrote it and claimed that I wanted to arrange a statement. However, the witness actually sent it to the [Deligious name] [M. Wife] and acknowledged that she was very likely to have transferred to someone. The judge told the witnesses: The referee asked the content. P35 explained that it was a personal confession that confirmed that M was in Damascus at the Suspicion of Crime. As a result of the interrogation, witnesses said they actually wrote their statements. The arbitrator said he did not believe in him because he was good at language, but his statement was written at a different [higher] level. The witness did not speak. During this time, the avitative family asked if someone was preparing for him. The witness denied this and explained that he had examined himself and used Google to correct his grammar. By the way, P35 states that M is definitely in Tartas. The P35 replied that it was actually thanks to the nobles at the time. The family also said that the P35 was very surprised at the intention of M's move to Damascus, but the statement stated that he had heard from M. Furthermore, the family added that the date of the record written when M was already in a temporary decision showed that the P35 had already knew the chat in the Facebook messenger mentioned above. 。 The witness acknowledged that M was actually detained, stating that it was actually a media reaction. The arbitrator repeatedly asked who had created a statement, or who had definitely lent it to the creation, but witnesses have no external support, and their intentions. I wrote it and claimed that I wanted to arrange a statement. However, the witness actually sent it to the [Deligious name] [M. Wife] and acknowledged that she was very likely to have transferred to someone. The judge told the witnesses:

During questioning, the witness said that he did not actually remember why he did not give a statement to the police or the court, and that he was misled. If the same thing were to happen, they would remember this. The umpire was actually presented, the witness was still aware of the chat on Facebook when he wrote the statement, but this P35 completely refuted. The Chairman of the Tribunal said that P35, in fact, the matter remains open and he must return on Thursday. Then a pause was made and the full text was read out, followed by some more questions. They mentioned the injuries sustained by M., which the witness agreed, and in fact he had heard, but was unable to explain many details, and did not count that M. was [redacted] from [redacted] to [redacted]. The presiding judge then told the witness that he would hear the next day.

The hearing was adjourned at 15:37.

The next court session will be held on March 21, 2024 at 10:00 a. m. At the beginning of this court day, President-elect Koller said that the defense team had actually expressed to him that they wanted to clarify something. The defense team stated that Mr. Defendant had released his own defense lawyer Al Agha from his attorney's license. And Andres said that his colleague Al Agha had actually told him and his colleague Bon that Al Agha had then used P35's testimony from the previous hearing and linked them with the statement that P35 had made [redacted date]. As a result, Al Agha actually contacted his wife and Uncle M about the preposition P35, who then spoke with P35, who later sent this statement to Al Agha, who recalled that Al Agha made it grammatically correct in Germanic, did not change anything in content, and sent it back to P35 for signature.

The chairman was angry, found Profena's compliance and duly noted it in the minutes of the meeting. After laying the rails, the referee tailed Kollur Al-Agha and questioned him why Al-Agha had spent hours in silence during the previous meeting, not commenting on P35's approval and not explaining that P35 could help him prepare a preliminary job application. Kollur effectively concluded that it was stupidity or arrogance. In fact, Kollur said that he was looking forward to a meeting to put Al-Agha on the stand again and question him about this statement. Kollur recalled his previous cross-examination of Al-Agha [see Court Minutes No. 60 for details] and recalled that Al-Agha had failed to prove it then, because Al-Agha was not emblematic of the German procedural system. Al-Agha in fact denied that the color explanation was true. During the scolding, Al-Agha only smiled. The presiding judge said that Al-Aghi would whine in his room], while Koller recalled Al-Aghi's poor workmanship at the time, and in fact Al-Aghi's ignorance of the German procedural system. Al-Aghi basically denied that the color explanation was true. During the reprimand, Al-Aghi only smiled. The presiding judge scolded Al-Aghi and said that he would whine in his room.

After this, prosecutor Schlepp asked the defendant to provide unanimity for the German Criminal Police (BKA) to manage geodata from his account on Facebook in order to find out where M. actually went to his corresponding personal account. The presiding judge introduced M.'s unanimity into the court protocol.

Later, Witnesses entered court, and the chairman told me that the instruction given in the previous question was valid. Judge Corler told Witnesses that he had to postpone the start of the hearing for Araga. [Other judges interrupted the lecture, indicating that this matter would be postponed.] Corler asked his witness if he had to fix or add it to his testimony. The P35 replied that A l-Aga had a phone call and was asked to send a request by email, so he said he could really add it. After the correction, Al Aga sent a statement to sign him. The jury asked if they could send this e-mail to the P35. The P35 agreed to this and sent it to the judges during the hearing. The judges asked if the P35 had recently heard from Al Aga, but the P35 answered negatively and was surprised that Alii did not say anything about this. After the previous question, P35 called a lawyer to hear legal opinions, it is clear that the lawyer is in the P35, and that Al Aigi is obliged to keep silence due to occupation secrets. I added it to explained.

In a subsequent interrogation, the judge recalled the P35 testimony that M worked in a Damascus and Tartus hospital, and asked if M was working elsewhere. The P35 replied that M worked for Redacted. The P35 did not remember whether M. was working in rural areas at a private hospital or a military hospital. However, the P35 reminded me that M arrived from M at the time, but the P35 was busy in Germany and could not attend.

The P35 explained that M. had returned to Damascus and worked at a municipal hospital. The judges wanted M to know why M had decided to transfer to a municipal hospital. The P35 explained that M refused to transfer to Harrast Hospital because he feared death due to the dangerous situation that was deployed there. The military hospital was not "freedom" when a person wanted to leave, so M sought help from his important person, P26, at the time.

The jury, focusing on the P35 explaining M's personality at the previous meeting, asked the P35 to explain the appearance of M according to his reminiscence. The P35 reminds me that M was a "fashionable" man, and [P35 explained the appearance of M at the time].

The arbitrators tried to admit the agreement with M. The excuse for what happened in Syria. P35 explained that the situation between Assad supporters and opponents is difficult. Although there are Christians as Assad supporters like M, M has expressed his transaction more than the P35. However, according to the P35 sentence, M. was not a constructive assad supporter, but not the Shabich [the interpreter explained this term to the arbitrator]. The arbitrator further asked M's attitude to the demonstration participants. According to the P35, M was not really satisfied with the acts of demonstrations, such as burning cars and destroying infrastructure. In fact, the P35 added that M. had undergone pressure as P35 and everyone else, and probably had been scolded to the demonstrators.

Later, the referee called for P35 to work with M in Germany. The P35 said that he actually met M at the German airport. The P35 still remembered that the two people lived in another city and only met on weekends, so the contact between them had decreased. The P35 answered the referee's question and acknowledged that it basically maintained a close relationship with M. Later, P35 talked about the New Year celebration where P35, M and his friends visited Germany.

Day 122 – March 22, 2024

The judge asked if there was a friendly thing left between the P35 and the M, and the difference was a difference in opinion. The P35 recalled that there were few differences or issues between them. On top of that, the P35 explained that he did not meet M during the hearing, and that he tried to shake hands once during the hearing so as not to be reflected in the referee. < SPAN> The arbitrators tried to admit the agreement with M. The excuse for what happened in Syria. P35 explained that the situation between Assad supporters and opponents is difficult. Although there are Christians as Assad supporters like M, M has expressed his transaction more than the P35. However, according to the P35 sentence, M. was not a constructive assad supporter, but not the Shabich [the interpreter explained this term to the arbitrator]. The arbitrator further asked M's attitude to the demonstration participants. According to the P35, M was not really satisfied with the acts of demonstrations, such as burning cars and destroying infrastructure. In fact, the P35 added that M. had undergone pressure as P35 and everyone else, and probably had been scolded to the demonstrators.

Later, the referee called for P35 to work with M in Germany. The P35 said that he actually met M at the German airport. The P35 still remembered that the two people lived in another city and only met on weekends, so the contact between them had decreased. The P35 answered the referee's question and acknowledged that it basically maintained a close relationship with M. Later, P35 talked about the New Year celebration where P35, M and his friends visited Germany.

The judge asked if there was a friendly thing left between the P35 and the M, and the difference was a difference in opinion. The P35 recalled that there were few differences or issues between them. On top of that, the P35 explained that he did not meet M during the hearing, and that he tried to shake hands once during the hearing so as not to be reflected in the referee. The arbitrators tried to admit the agreement with M. The excuse for what happened in Syria. P35 explained that the situation between Assad supporters and opponents is difficult. Although there are Christians as Assad supporters like M, M has expressed his transaction more than the P35. However, according to the P35 sentence, M. was not a constructive assad supporter, but not the Shabich [the interpreter explained this term to the arbitrator]. The arbitrator further asked M's attitude to the demonstration participants. According to the P35, M was not really satisfied with the acts of demonstrations, such as burning cars and destroying infrastructure. In fact, the P35 added that M. had undergone pressure as P35 and everyone else, and probably had been scolded to the demonstrators.

Later, the referee called for P35 to work with M in Germany. The P35 said that he actually met M at the German airport. The P35 still remembered that the two people lived in another city and only met on weekends, so the contact between them had decreased. The P35 answered the referee's question and acknowledged that it basically maintained a close relationship with M. Later, P35 talked about the New Year celebration where P35, M and his friends visited Germany.

The judge asked if there was a friendly thing left between the P35 and the M, and the difference was a difference in opinion. The P35 recalled that there were few differences or issues between them. On top of that, the P35 explained that he did not meet M during the hearing, and that he tried to shake hands once during the hearing so as not to be reflected in the referee.

After a break, the judges asked to hear P35 about the allegations against M. P35 said that he had heard nothing new in the Al Jazeera report, because M had already been talking about his ex-colleague, [redacted name], even before the New Year celebrations. According to P35, M worked in the trauma department and was naturally dealing with injuries sustained during the war, just like other Christians, Arabs and Muslims. He added that there are good and bad people among Sunnis. The judges noted that the connection between the threats against his ex-colleague M and the fact that M is a Christian was a conclusion made by P35. The judges wanted to know if there were other reasons for the threats, for example, whether M. was hostile to demonstrators, as P35 stated in his police interrogation, or whether there were differences of opinion between M. and his ex-colleague. As P35 did not have a proper memory, the jury gave him keywords such as "[redacted]" to see if they could hear it. P35 confirmed that many doctors ask other doctors for help (and privately), although he said he had not heard this from M. Unfortunately, P35 added that groups with certain religious views work in pro-regime hospitals and that such groups try to hire doctors. After a break, the judges asked to hear P35 about the allegations against M. P35 said that he had heard nothing new from the Al Jazeera report, because M had already spoken about his former colleague, [redacted name], even before the New Year celebrations. According to P35, M worked in the trauma department and naturally dealt with injuries sustained during the war, just like other Christians, Arabs and Muslims. He added that there are good and bad people among Sunnis. The judges noted that the connection between the threats against his former colleague M and the fact that M is a Christian was P35's conclusion. The judges wanted to know if there were other reasons for the threat, for example, if M. was hostile towards the protesters, as P35 stated in his police interrogation, or if there were differences of opinion between M. and a former colleague. As P35 did not have a proper memory, the jury gave him keywords such as “[redacted]” to see if he could hear them. P35 confirmed that many doctors ask other doctors for help (and privately), although he said he had not heard this from M. Unfortunately, P35 added that groups with certain religious views work in pro-regime hospitals and that such groups try to hire doctors. After a break, the judges asked to hear P35 about the allegations against M. P35 said that he had not heard anything new in the Al Jazeera report, because M had already spoken about his former colleague, [redacted name], even before the New Year celebrations. According to P35, M. worked in the trauma department and, like other Christians, Arabs and Muslims, he naturally dealt with injuries sustained during the war. He added that there are good and bad Sunnis. The judges noted that the connection between the threats against his former colleague M. and the fact that M. is a Christian was P35's conclusion. The judges wanted to know if there were other reasons for the threats, for example, if M. was hostile to demonstrators, as P35 stated in his police interview, or if there were differences of opinion between M. and his former colleague. Since P35 did not have a proper memory, the jury gave him keywords such as "redacted" to see if they could hear it. P35 confirmed that many doctors ask other doctors for help (and personally), although he said he had not heard this from M. Unfortunately, P35 added that groups with certain religious views work in pro-regime hospitals and that such groups try to hire doctors.

The P35 did not hear anything about the struggle between M and his former colleagues, and the judge wanted to know why M had blamed his colleagues, according to the P35. According to the P35, each neighboring area had a specific religion and hated each other. The P35 read a colleague's post on Facebook, which included extreme accusations to Christians. The P35 emphasized that he had a Muslim colleague, but he was completely different from his colleagues. The P35 was surprised that his colleagues M were writing themselves openly, saying, "Is there a Christian colleague? What is his motivation? Why M, P35," M "is" M. I thought it was because it was popular in "Star". The P35 was trying to explain the reason in German, but the interpreter was in between, and in his opinion that the P35 was in mind with "mentality." P35 confirmed that he had taken his colleagues religious mentality in mind.

In addition, the judge wanted to know what the colleague wrote and what P35 read. The P35 does not remember the content of each letter, but "Christians regret" [because the structure of German, English and Arabic sentences is different, so the translator is equivalent to "This is". He said he remembered the negative impression of the content. When the judges asked, "What does" this "mean? The judge did not think this was extreme. The P35 did not agree with this, and explained that "regret" could be in any meaning, including the meaning of dying. The referee did not think this was easy. The P35 said that this was not a very pleasant expression, especially during the war. The interpreter broke again and said that this could be a threat. The P35 said that this could mean intimidation. The judge said that there was no such thing in Germany. < SPAN> P35 has not heard anything about the struggle between M and his former colleagues, so the judge desired what M, according to the P35, was blamed his colleagues. According to the P35, each neighboring area had a specific religion and hated each other. The P35 read a colleague's post on Facebook, which included extreme accusations to Christians. The P35 emphasized that he had a Muslim colleague, but he was completely different from his colleagues. The P35 was surprised that his colleagues M were writing themselves openly, saying, "Is there a Christian colleague? What is his motivation? Why M, P35," M "is" M. I thought it was because it was popular in "Star". The P35 was trying to explain the reason in German, but the interpreter was in between, and in his opinion that the P35 was in mind with "mentality." P35 confirmed that he had taken his colleagues religious mentality in mind.